The Child Protection Policy has been highly implemented ever since the K-12 Curriculum has also been implemented. DO 40, s.2012 ensures the safety of children, especially the students in all institutions. Protection includes Abuse, Violence, Exploitation, Discrimination, Bullying and Other Forms of Abuse.
In the traditional days way back, students get to be "punished" for reasons like not submitting home works in time, being mischievous in classes, and being late. Of course, these are just some of the violations students commit that teachers have the leisure to "teach them a lesson" once in a while by letting them stay out in class, getting their hands slapped by a ruler or by hand. Some of these may effect the physical and psychological aspects of a student. But I tend to wonder if this is necessary since students who did not go through the strict implementation grew up to be disciplined and well-behaved individuals, making them mature. With my observation in the past years with this implementation, students get to fully enjoy and abuse this opportunity that makes them look as if they have power over their teacher, so with one reprimand, they instantly would report their teachers to the office. Sadly, this has a lot of pros and cons, especially with the millenials as students.
In the school I am observing in, this is very evident. Student get to slack off, knowing that they are "the boss" in the classroom. Even if the teacher has a lot of patience, one can only tolerate the behavior. It's sad to see it every single time in the classroom. But I can say that this is highly implemented. There were actually teachers who were used to disciplining students physically (and brutally) who left the school and some changed.
In the traditional days way back, students get to be "punished" for reasons like not submitting home works in time, being mischievous in classes, and being late. Of course, these are just some of the violations students commit that teachers have the leisure to "teach them a lesson" once in a while by letting them stay out in class, getting their hands slapped by a ruler or by hand. Some of these may effect the physical and psychological aspects of a student. But I tend to wonder if this is necessary since students who did not go through the strict implementation grew up to be disciplined and well-behaved individuals, making them mature. With my observation in the past years with this implementation, students get to fully enjoy and abuse this opportunity that makes them look as if they have power over their teacher, so with one reprimand, they instantly would report their teachers to the office. Sadly, this has a lot of pros and cons, especially with the millenials as students.
In the school I am observing in, this is very evident. Student get to slack off, knowing that they are "the boss" in the classroom. Even if the teacher has a lot of patience, one can only tolerate the behavior. It's sad to see it every single time in the classroom. But I can say that this is highly implemented. There were actually teachers who were used to disciplining students physically (and brutally) who left the school and some changed.
Indeed! The students needs to be protected and also they must know their rights as a person.
ReplyDeleteThere should also be more integration of rights in their classes.
DeleteAs a future teacher, I hope we can make our future students understand why is there a Child Protection Policy, and not taking advantage of it.
ReplyDeleteThat's the sad reality because students abuse it to the breaking point. Fortunately, there are still students who understand properly.
DeleteIndeed, as a future teacher we must know and help students to understand the child protection policy, so that it will not take advantage of it.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good suggestion! Teachers can integrate it during their lessons so that they get to understand the policy thoroughly
Delete